India invokes Section 69A to ban Telegram.
NEW DELHI: India has temporarily banned Telegram. On June 16, 2026 the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology issued directives to internet service providers and app store operators restricting access to the messaging platform until midnight on June 22, covering the NEET UG re-examination scheduled for June 21 and its immediate aftermath. A second order requires Telegram to disable its message-editing feature for already-posted messages until June 30. The National Testing Agency which formally recommended both actions described them as a measure of last resort taken after targeted channel-level takedowns failed to stop organised cheating rackets from defrauding candidates.
This is the first time India has imposed a pre-emptive, platform-wide block on a messaging application of this scale to preserve the integrity of a national examination.
What the Cheating Rackets Were Actually Doing
The ban targets two distinct forms of fraud. The first is straightforward: channels operating under names including PAPER LEAKED NEET, Re-NEET 2026 and Private Mafia were openly demanding payments ranging from a few thousand rupees to several lakh from anxious candidates in exchange for purported access to the re-examination paper. The Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre under the Ministry of Home Affairs had been coordinating targeted takedowns of these channels. The takedowns were not fast enough.
The second form of fraud is more technically sophisticated and explains the separate message-editing order. Telegram allows channel administrators to retroactively edit already-published posts, including replacing attached files while retaining the original timestamp of the post. Cheating syndicates exploited this by posting innocuous messages before the examination. Once the official paper was released post-examination they edited those older messages to insert the actual questions, then screenshotted the manipulated chat log as supposed proof of a pre-exam leak. The fabricated screenshots were then circulated on social media, causing panic among candidates and undermining public confidence in the examination. By disabling the editing feature until June 30 the government has closed this specific avenue of post-examination fabrication.
Why the Re-Examination Is Happening
The NEET UG re-examination is itself a consequence of systemic failure. The original examination held on May 3, 2026, for over 22.7 lakh registered candidates, was cancelled on May 12 after investigations confirmed its integrity had been compromised. The Rajasthan Special Operations Group found striking similarities between a guess paper circulated via WhatsApp and Telegram channels in Sikar and the actual examination questions. The compromise was traced to the printing stage in Jaipur. The CBI which took over the inquiry, has arrested over 45 individuals across Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Bihar including a school headmistress appointed as an NTA subject expert who allegedly leaked the Physics paper.
This crisis followed the NEET UG 2024 controversy in which 67 candidates received a perfect score of 720 and grace marks were arbitrarily awarded to 1,563 candidates. A high-level committee chaired by former ISRO chief K. Radhakrishnan subsequently recommended transitioning to encrypted digital paper delivery, biometric verification and phased online testing. Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan has announced that NEET UG will shift to a fully computer-based format from 2027. The 2026 leak demonstrated that these reforms had not been implemented in time.
The Legal Challenge Already Taking Shape
MeitY invoked Section 69A of the IT Act, which permits the government to block online content in the interest of public order. The Internet Freedom Foundation has argued that the ban is constitutionally incompatible with Article 19. Its position is that Section 69A authorises targeted blocking of specific information, not a blanket shutdown of an entire platform used by millions of legitimate users, including students relying on Telegram for study materials ahead of the very examination the government seeks to protect. The IFF further contends that the order directing Telegram to modify its message-editing feature has no clear statutory basis within Section 69A.
The Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal versus Union of India 2015 upheld Section 69A specifically because it carried procedural safeguards, including a mandatory pre-decisional hearing for the affected platform and written recorded reasons. Section 69A blocking orders are kept confidential under Rule 16 of the 2009 Blocking Rules, which critics say creates a system of censorship without adequate public accountability. Congress spokesperson Sandeep Dikshit called the block a total failure of the government, arguing that since Telegram is an encrypted platform, banning it does nothing to address internal leaks that occur upstream within the examination supply chain itself.
What Happens After June 22
Over ten lakh candidates downloaded their re-examination admit cards within 24 hours of the portal opening, indicating that candidate participation remains high despite the controversy. Home Secretary Govind Mohan has directed all state governments to enforce strict security protocols. The CRPF and CISF will provide armed escorts during the transportation of examination materials. Vetted personnel with no relatives appearing in the examination have been selected for examination duty.
The Telegram ban will lift on June 22. The message-editing restriction runs until June 30. The deeper questions it has raised about whether platform-wide pre-emptive bans are a proportionate use of state power, whether India’s examination security infrastructure is structurally sound enough to prevent the need for such measures and whether NTA’s promised shift to computer-based testing will actually be implemented will outlast both deadlines.
About the Author
